On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:09:55PM +0100, Luca Manganelli wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think it makes sense to keep up with the funded bug fixing if we have > > the money > > > > Maybe the QGIS testing funding would fix all these probelms? Now it's > funded! > http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing​
That project is about making current tests pass and keeping them passing for the future. Very important, glad it made it ! It won't be matter of a few days, nor it will involve fixing bugs that do not have a test. But if bugfixes funded for 2.6 will come with a testcase guarding for them not to come back again it'll be great. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
