On 10/28/2014 10:50 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:09:55PM +0100, Luca Manganelli wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]>
wrote:
I think it makes sense to keep up with the funded bug fixing if we have
the money
Maybe the QGIS testing funding would fix all these probelms? Now it's
funded!
http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing​
That project is about making current tests pass and keeping them passing
for the future. Very important, glad it made it !
It won't be matter of a few days, nor it will involve fixing bugs that do
not have a test. But if bugfixes funded for 2.6 will come with a testcase
guarding for them not to come back again it'll be great.
Thank you for the clarification Sandro, this mail has escaped my notice.
I am also glad that this campaign made it. I will make sure that I will
work on this in the upcoming weeks (not only) to ensure that new test
cases being written now are taken into consideration.
-- Matthias
--------------------------------------
Please help taking QGIS to the next level of quality. Before November 15 !
http://blog.vitu.ch/10102014-1046/crowdfunding-initiative-automated-testing
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
