Hi Mattheo, I totally agree with that feature request and am volunteer to work on that if needed.
I have been doing experiments with processing scripts using library such as pandas (relying on matplotlib), seaborn and plot.ly. See "Summarize_numeric_columns_using_Pandas" script in my github https://github.com/aeag/QGIS-Processing/tree/master/scripts ) for a first example. We also have unpublished scripts making graphs if needed. I expect to have a student working on that this year: exploring what libs are worth being shipped with qgis, and developping some processing tools using that. The tries I have made up to now seems to conclude that the "must have" lib is Pandas. Many QGIS processing tools working on non geographic data are limited when datasets grow up. Pandas let it be extrmely fast and concise, in a syntax very close from "R". That may be worth shipping it.. It weights nothing in comparison of Numpy (already required).. Once pandas shipped, we could probably make great improvements to Statist and its friends. Cheers Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/graph-and-plots-improvements-tp5194130p5194168.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
