Hi On 03/18/2015 01:39 PM, Régis Haubourg wrote: > Hi Mattheo, > I totally agree with that feature request and am volunteer to work on that > if needed. > > I have been doing experiments with processing scripts using library such as > pandas (relying on matplotlib), seaborn and plot.ly. > See "Summarize_numeric_columns_using_Pandas" script in my github > https://github.com/aeag/QGIS-Processing/tree/master/scripts ) for a first > example. We also have unpublished scripts making graphs if needed. > > I expect to have a student working on that this year: exploring what libs > are worth being shipped with qgis, and developping some processing tools > using that. > > > The tries I have made up to now seems to conclude that the "must have" lib > is Pandas. Many QGIS processing tools working on non geographic data are > limited when datasets grow up. Pandas let it be extrmely fast and concise, > in a syntax very close from "R". That may be worth shipping it.. > It weights nothing in comparison of Numpy (already required)..
Pandas is really great. I used it a lot for my master thesis and was excited, especially in combination with ipython notebook it's great to process, combine and visualize data. Just a minior sidenote: it makes use of numpy IIRC, so it's not an alternative to it but something on top of it. All the best Matthias > > Once pandas shipped, we could probably make great improvements to Statist > and its friends. > > Cheers > Régis > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/graph-and-plots-improvements-tp5194130p5194168.html > Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
