Hi Matthias, On Tue, 02. Jun 2015 at 11:31:47 +0200, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > On Tue, 02. Jun 2015 at 13:34:56 +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: > >> I'd be in favour of a hardline "no breaks allowed" approached. You break > >> travis, your commit gets reverted. > > -1 > > > A general rule doesn't make sense to me - it depends on the break. > > If you break travis, you should fix it.
> For the record, can you elaborate which types of breaks should not be > fixed and/or why certain breaks should be fixed in master instead of in > a separate branch/pull request? Huh? I didn't say breaks shouldn't be fixed. I said just the opposite. But I said the fix should not not generally be a simple revert. Jürgen -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
