Just my 2 cents on a topic I know nothing about :) ... or we can have a "disable rule" and an "invisible rule". Disabled rules go to ELSE, invisible rules don't go to ELSE.
Cheers On 06/19/2015 04:13 PM, Alexandre Neto wrote: > So, can I open a ticket? > > Alexandre > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > In my opinion this is a bug. I agree that by switching off the > rule should not make the features fall into the ELSE rule. At > least from a usability point of view. Or we need to ELSE rules - a > "TRUE ELSE" rule that behaves like now and an "ELSE" rule that > behaves like the users expect it to behave. > > Andreas > > > On 19.06.2015 13:36, Etienne Trimaille wrote: >> I've this kind of bug too. >> >> If you create a categorized symbology, apply the change and then >> switch to a ruled-based symbology (keeping the previous rules), >> you will see that the ELSE statement will draw features twice. >> >> Enable "show feature count" to check. >> >> I didn't check if there is a ticket for that. >> >> >> 2015-06-19 13:18 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Neto <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> Indeed Nathan, >> >> But do you thinks that is what you were expecting? when you >> turn the "layer" off? >> >> Alexandre >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Nathan Woodrow >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I would say they are getting skipped in the rule check so >> fall into the else rule. >> >> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 9:05 pm Alexandre Neto >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Using the rule-based symbology with several rules and >> an ELSE expression. If you, in map canvas legend, set >> a rule "layer" to invisible, all it's features will >> be represented with the ELSE Symbol. >> >> Not sure if this is the expected behaviour. I would >> expect that those feature would simply became invisible. >> >> Should I open a ticket? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alexandre Neto >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
