Hi, On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Exactly - these are good terms to use - "disabled rule" and "invisible > rule". Thanks for suggesting these, Andreas. Alexandre - could you please > note this in the ticket? > > Andreas > > Not sure if this was what Matthias meant. Anyway, I have created a ticket summing up this thread and further discussion can continue in there. https://hub.qgis.org/issues/13022 Alexandre > > On 19.06.2015 16:33, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > > Just my 2 cents on a topic I know nothing about :) > > ... or we can have a "disable rule" and an "invisible rule". Disabled > rules go to ELSE, invisible rules don't go to ELSE. > > Cheers > > On 06/19/2015 04:13 PM, Alexandre Neto wrote: > > So, can I open a ticket? > > Alexandre > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In my opinion this is a bug. I agree that by switching off the rule >> should not make the features fall into the ELSE rule. At least from a >> usability point of view. Or we need to ELSE rules - a "TRUE ELSE" rule that >> behaves like now and an "ELSE" rule that behaves like the users expect it >> to behave. >> >> Andreas >> >> >> On 19.06.2015 13:36, Etienne Trimaille wrote: >> >> I've this kind of bug too. >> >> If you create a categorized symbology, apply the change and then switch >> to a ruled-based symbology (keeping the previous rules), you will see that >> the ELSE statement will draw features twice. >> >> Enable "show feature count" to check. >> >> I didn't check if there is a ticket for that. >> >> >> 2015-06-19 13:18 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Neto <[email protected]>: >> >>> Indeed Nathan, >>> >>> But do you thinks that is what you were expecting? when you turn the >>> "layer" off? >>> >>> Alexandre >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I would say they are getting skipped in the rule check so fall into the >>>> else rule. >>>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 9:05 pm Alexandre Neto <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Using the rule-based symbology with several rules and an ELSE >>>>> expression. If you, in map canvas legend, set a rule "layer" to invisible, >>>>> all it's features will be represented with the ELSE Symbol. >>>>> >>>>> Not sure if this is the expected behaviour. I would expect that those >>>>> feature would simply became invisible. >>>>> >>>>> Should I open a ticket? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Alexandre Neto >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing > [email protected]http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
