Il 11/09/2015 11:29, kimaidou ha scritto: > +1 for this ! Hi all, thanks for raising this point, IMHO a serious one. I'm very much in favour of removing redundancy. In this case, however, I think we better be careful before removing fTools, because:
* people are used to it, and for one-shot analyses it is (slightly) easier to run than Processing (weak argument) * we do not have enough development resources to make Processing bulletproof, particularly for 3rd party backends; therefore, we encounter occasional problems, and we cannot guarantee a smooth user experience in all cases (strong argument). First issue can be solved, as suggested, by adding menu shortcuts to Processing analyses, to mimic existing situation. Second one is more serious: IMHO we really need a dedicated developer in this area: any power user (=larger institutions) are willing to take it? Similar things may be said for GDALTools. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
