I think Arnaud also raised the question sometime ago (my fault for not commenting on that at the time...), and it should be easy to add those shortcuts, but I haven't had much time lately for working on Processing.
I wont be attending the next Hackfest, but sounds like a task that can be accomplished in those days, and I will be happy to help remotely or take it completely and try to develop a subsystem in Processing to customize the menus and toolbars with Processing algorithms. Hope this helps 2015-09-11 12:52 GMT+02:00 Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]>: > Il 11/09/2015 11:29, kimaidou ha scritto: >> +1 for this ! > > Hi all, > thanks for raising this point, IMHO a serious one. I'm very much in > favour of removing redundancy. In this case, however, I think we better > be careful before removing fTools, because: > > * people are used to it, and for one-shot analyses it is (slightly) > easier to run than Processing (weak argument) > * we do not have enough development resources to make Processing > bulletproof, particularly for 3rd party backends; therefore, we > encounter occasional problems, and we cannot guarantee a smooth user > experience in all cases (strong argument). > > First issue can be solved, as suggested, by adding menu shortcuts to > Processing analyses, to mimic existing situation. > Second one is more serious: IMHO we really need a dedicated developer in > this area: any power user (=larger institutions) are willing to take it? > Similar things may be said for GDALTools. > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
