On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 01.10.2015 17:26, Sandro Santilli wrote: > >So while the discussion on geos-dev started, I'm thinking that > >for GEOS you might prefer to have a solution that also works > >with older GEOS version ? Note that doing that by keeping the > >dependency on the C++ interface might be a puzzle for packagers > >because every version of GEOS is intentionally marked as being > >binary incompatible with the previous. > > > >Would it make sense to just do the gridding internally (dropping > >the geosc++ dep) for now and postpone the proper precision model > >implementation to only be available with the newer GEOS release ? > > > >The idea is to ship a 3.6 version of GEOS capable of the PrecisionModel > >control before February. > > > I suppose I could replace the incomplete precision reduction > implementation with a hand-rolled snap-to-grid for now and wait for > GEOS 3.6. If there are no objections, I'll move on with this this > weekend.
Sounds good to me. I'd still love to gather your comments on geos-dev list for the new interface. --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
