Hi,
Andreas how would you see the LTR releases working in relation to a slower release cycle? I have thought at times that we should make the LTR’s longer lived e.g. 2 years (1 year is not really that ‘long term’).
I agree, 2 years support for the LTR releases seems more useful. But this would then mean, that if we have an LTR release every year, that we'd need to maintain 2 LTR versions in parallel.
Or we'll try the Ubuntu release cycle ... every 2nd year there will be a release with long-term support and then maintained for 4-5 years (seems a bit long to me). The Ubuntu release cycle works really well for my Linux servers - I have to say. I use only the LT Ubuntu releases and have a good mixture of being relatively up-to-date while only having to do major upgrades every second year.
Andreas _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
