On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:21:59AM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote: > valid. But that said, my honest thoughts are that the BEST way to > ensure stable, regression-free releases is to extend the test suite.
+1 > My plea to sponsors: > > If you're funding QGIS development work and the contract doesn't > mention something like "we will totally soak this work in unit tests" > then rip up the contract and run. (Or ask them nicely to revise the > contract to include this ;) ) If you're funding work and it's not > being accompanied by unit tests then you aren't getting what you paid > for, and you'll be forever forced to test your funded features in > every new release manually for regressions... +FF --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
