On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 05:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > On 11/12/2015 04:48 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > > > > To be honest, I like the idea of rendering tests. I know they are > > fragile in their current incarnation, but being a graphical > > application having tests actually check what the user would see > > is a good way to catch many issues. > > They won't go away. And there are good reasons for them sometimes. They > just have been used as roundhousekick tests for everything in the past. > But if every developer shortly asks himself if > * there is no other possibility to test a particular thing > * tries to reduce the noise in the picture as much as possible > it's fine to have some of them.
I was actually thinking it would be nice to make producing such tests easier, by allowing to just drop a .qgs project file in a dir and have that trigger rendering on a small output image to compare against a reference image. Right now it takes sooo much time to write such tests --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer