On 18 January 2016 at 09:03, Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear QGIS Developers > > > For some time now we have been talking about moving to 3.0. The PSC is > looking for proposals on how to manage the process of moving to QGIS 3.0. For > a little more context please see the blog post I have made [1]. Once we have > all the proposals in (please see the example from Matthias Kuhn at the bottom > of the aforementioned post and keep it nice & simple) we will collate them > and then select one (or a hybrid of several) and share those plans with the > broader community. I will make all the proposals publicly available and we > will make the final decision in consultation with the developer community. >
Great summary Tim! Thanks for helping push this along. It's probably no surprise (since Matthias and I have spoken at length regarding this), but I'm in favour of Proposal 1. I just don't believe we have the resources to support any form of parallel development like proposal 2 requires. Nyall > > [1] http://blog.qgis.org/2016/01/17/help-us-to-plan-for-qgis-3-0/ > > Regards > > Tim > > > > Tim Sutton > QGIS Project Steering Committee Member > [email protected] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
