Hi, On 01/19/2016 11:48 AM, Hugo Mercier wrote: > Just an idea: what about a 2.16 being an LTR rather than the 2.14 ?
That would address some of the concerns brought up. I like the idea. Best -- Matthias Kuhn OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
