Paolo Cavallini wrote > Il 19/01/2016 14:12, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> QGIS is now used by a lot of professional users worldwide. A lot of them > ... >> Hugos suggestion to have 2.16 as the LT release instead of 2.14 would >> also be fine and acceptable for me. Moving to 3.0 immediately would not >> work well for us. > > Thanks Andreas, sounds reasonable to me. > It would be useful to know what are the improvements planned for 2.16: > could devs and customers share this with us? > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list
> [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer hey, we have a QEP process running around labeling / callout lines / saving ressources with qgs / porting easycustom labeling and mask plugin to core equivalent. We can target 3.0, there is no hurry, as no coding work has been done yet. By the way, I would be pleased that we can achieve a vote on those QEP's so that I can plan future contracts and QGIS community can take that into account. Hugo, any opinion from your point of view? All the best Régis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Help-us-plan-for-QGIS-3-0-tp5245740p5246157.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
