Hi Even,
Interesting - does this mean QGIS will be a WFS 2.0 compatible WFS
client in the future?
Out of curiosity: may I ask who will be funding the project? How likely
will this land in the upcoming QGIS version (2.16/3.0)?
We just talked about the WFS client problems today at my new employer.
We also had problems, that QGIS did not load/display all features that
were served by our WFS server. Other WFS clients (FME, Geomedia) did
load all of the features. Potentially related to
https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968 - I will have to investigate.
Anyway - glad to hear that there will be some work done to improve the
sad state of QGIS as a WFS client.
Thanks,
Andreas
On 26.01.2016 19:14, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I've submitted a QEP related to enhancements in the WFS provider (WFS 1.1/2.0
support, on-disk cache, server-side joins, ...) :
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/53
I'd be happy to hear opinions on this.
Best regards,
Even
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer