Le mardi 26 janvier 2016 20:23:41, Andreas Neumann a écrit : > Hi Even, > > Interesting - does this mean QGIS will be a WFS 2.0 compatible WFS > client in the future?
Yes that's the intent (with the restrictions mentionned in the QEP) > > Out of curiosity: may I ask who will be funding the project? I'll be able to communicate on that once this has been secured with them. > How likely > will this land in the upcoming QGIS version (2.16/3.0)? I'm not sure if the planning of the next QGIS version has been decided yet, but this is likely something that would be done this first semester. > > We just talked about the WFS client problems today at my new employer. > We also had problems, that QGIS did not load/display all features that > were served by our WFS server. Other WFS clients (FME, Geomedia) did > load all of the features. Potentially related to > https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968 - I will have to investigate. > > Anyway - glad to hear that there will be some work done to improve the > sad state of QGIS as a WFS client. > > Thanks, > Andreas > > On 26.01.2016 19:14, Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've submitted a QEP related to enhancements in the WFS provider (WFS > > 1.1/2.0 support, on-disk cache, server-side joins, ...) : > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/53 > > > > I'd be happy to hear opinions on this. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Even > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
