No, we havent' moved to the main repo. However, not much work has been done lately, and we haven't discussed about how to continue or when to move all this to the main repo.
Looks like the project is not being very succesful... 2016-02-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Anita Graser <[email protected]>: > Hi, > Are you still working on https://github.com/qgis/pyqgis_wrappers or have > you moved to the main repo? > Best wishes, > Anita > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Victor Olaya <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Stefan >> >> We opened this repo to work in there >> >> https://github.com/qgis/pyqgis_wrappers >> >> Nathan moved his code there already. I haven't had much time, but will >> move mine and keep working in there >> >> >> >> 2015-11-19 20:42 GMT+01:00 Stefan Keller <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Tim, Victor[1], John [2], Nathan [3] and Gary [4] >>> >>> Good initiative which I also would keep in a sandbox so long. >>> I'd like to check my plugins against (and probably contribute to) this >>> common set of functions for QGIS Python plugins. >>> >>> [1] seems to be the unifid place and this has been changed since 21 >>> days. >>> Is this the common set for now? >>> >>> :Stefan >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/volaya/qgiscommons >>> [2] https://github.com/lparchaeology/libarkqgis. >>> [3] https://github.com/NathanW2/parfait >>> [4] http://locatepress.com/ppg/data_code >>> >>> 2015-11-08 23:21 GMT+01:00 Nathan Woodrow <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> No even really that. Just mainly because like we said it's not >>>> considered stable at the moment and we don't want to be linked to the >>>> release cycle. It will be good to mainly just test ideas first and then >>>> merge it later. >>>> >>>> - Nathan >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> On 05 Nov 2015, at 17:34, Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Il 05/11/2015 09:24, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: >>>>> >>>>> Yep that is the plan. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I see you already done it, so now it's probably pointless, but: why not >>>>> using git submodules? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Many consider submodules a PITA e.g. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://somethingsinistral.net/blog/git-submodules-are-probably-not-the-answer/ >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> All the best. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu >>>>> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> — >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tim Sutton >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source: >>>>> >>>>> * Desktop GIS programming services >>>>> * Geospatial web development >>>>> * GIS Training >>>>> * Consulting Services >>>>> >>>>> Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net >>>>> Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee >>>>> >>>>> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qgis-developer mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
