I'm sure you have much choice when it gets to GPL. Your plugin is still GPL regardless. It does get a bit slippery once you include other libraries but I think it's fine in this case. They are all open source so no harm really.
Same as use using GDAL with it being MIT On Wed, 25 May 2016 6:56 pm Tom Chadwin <tom.chad...@nnpa.org.uk> wrote: > Of course, since qgis2web is middleware, its licence also has to be > compatible with Leaflet, Openlayers 3, and their respective plugins, none > of > which are GPL. Since the plugin bundles and distributes these libraries, I > would say complying with their licences is of greater importance than > complying with QGIS, which is not distributed with the plugin. > > Not trying to start an argument - I just want to do the right thing by the > creators of all the software on which mine is built. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/License-Summary-tp5006354p5268102.html > Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer