>>I guess I am just sceptical that GPL's requirement for GPL licensing of a product, purely by virtue of importing the first product as a library, is likely to hold much legal weight.
That is one of the main things with GPL and why a lot of people do tend to avoid it I guess. Not much we can do for it now all plugins are GPL. On Wed, 25 May 2016 8:01 pm Paolo Cavallini <[email protected]> wrote: > Il 25/05/2016 11:42, Tom Chadwin ha scritto: > > > I guess I am just sceptical that GPL's requirement for GPL licensing of a > > product, purely by virtue of importing the first product as a library, is > > likely to hold much legal weight. > > We asked for legal advice, and that was the official response. > All the best. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
