Hey Anita, Having worked on reducing the width of the rendering UIs in the last dev cycle, I'm familiar with the issue raised here :)
Basically, the singleband pseudocolor renderer's minimum width is determined (ATM) by the "Color [ramp]" row. More specifically, if you have a color ramp with a long label, your combo box is going to eat a lot of horizontal space. There's a lot that can be easily done to alleviate that There's a long-term solution that might be nice to implement: get rid of the combo box in favor of a new widget that'd emulate the color button widget but instead of showing a plan color it'd show the gradient selected, and the button drop down arrow would list the color ramps and allow for editing (and creation). That's a significant undertaking, but might be nice to have in 3.0 :) Math On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Compared to the Singleband gray GUI, the Singleband pseudocolor GUI for > raster styling is twice as wide. This makes it difficult to use in the > styling panel. > > Is anyone working on this? Should I open a ticket? > > Best wishes, > Anita > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
