On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> wrote:
> The problem with moving the [ edit ] button and the [x] invert checkbox > below the combo box is that it'd end up eating vertical space, which is as > precious and needed as horizontal spacing :) > I'd rather scroll vertically than horizontally. Concerning vertical space: The Layer rendering and Resampling sections should be collapsible like the Load min/max values section. Actually, I think Layer rendering and Resampling are probably used less than Load min/max. Best wishes, Anita > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Anita Graser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Mathieu, >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Anita, >>> >>> Having worked on reducing the width of the rendering UIs in the last dev >>> cycle, I'm familiar with the issue raised here :) >>> >>> Basically, the singleband pseudocolor renderer's minimum width is >>> determined (ATM) by the "Color [ramp]" row. More specifically, if you have >>> a color ramp with a long label, your combo box is going to eat a lot of >>> horizontal space. There's a lot that can be easily done to alleviate that >>> >> >> Thank you for the insights! That makes sense. Maybe as a first simple >> step we could just rearrange the Edit and Invert buttons and move them >> below the color ramp combo box. The combo box itself could also have a >> maximum size which truncates longer ramp names. >> >> Should I open a ticket? >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
