On 20 October 2016 at 17:17, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> wrote: > On 10/20/2016 09:07 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: >>> I'm just wondering what the plans are following 2.18's release >>> tomorrow? > > I am in favor of shooting down any 2.20 plans and fully focus on 3.0 to > reduce the backporting overhead and improve dev-time and user-awareness > towards 3.0. > > We could potentially also allow some non-intrusive features to land in > there (some plans regarding this already exist). > >> >> At the moment master_2 Travis builds fail, so maybe we should >> first make sure to be able to release tomorrow ? >> >> https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS/builds > > And looking at the failing test here, that shouldn't be something we > should worry about: > > https://dash.orfeo-toolbox.org/testDetails.php?test=47814587&build=249133 > > Plus I'd prefer to keep this discussion separate.
Should be fixed now anyway: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/7cfe0412c6dafb43942b5b4c9ed7064007209673 > > Matthias > > >> >> --strk; >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
