>> "Would that become a LTR?" remains however. 2.14 is still LTR and 3.20 will be the next one.
- Nathan On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 2:52 AM, DelazJ <del...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Given the introduction of the 2.18 release changelog [1] being written, it > seems that one of the questions asked here is already answered: 2.18 is the > last 2.x release. No 2.20 to be expected. which in imho makes sense due to > the small number of features (compared to previous releases) > > "Would that become a LTR?" remains however. > > Regards, > Harrissou > > [1] http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/2.18.0/ > > Envoyé depuis mon HTC > > ----- Reply message ----- > De : "Tom Chadwin" <tom.chad...@nnpa.org.uk> > Pour : <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> > Objet : [Qgis-developer] Plans after friday's release? > Date : jeu., oct. 20, 2016 15:03 > > Having another 2.x LTR very much reduces the impetus for orgs to make the big > jump to 3. 2.14 as LTR seems the best approach. > > > > ----- > Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Plans-after-friday-s-release-tp5291616p5291706.html > Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing listqgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
