On 6 December 2016 at 16:33, Victor Olaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > This would have some advantages. Providers would be better organized,
Can you elaborate on this? Is it just better organised because they would be in separate repos? > and they could be updated and managed independently. In the future, we > might even think about packaging both the provider itself and the > backend app, which would be a much better user experience. Also, for > beginners it would be easier and less intimidating to have a simpler > toolbox (and with just the algorithms that are more robust and work > always out of the box), and then extend it as needed. I agree with this point. I like to see us push attention toward the native algorithms, as those are the only ones we have direct control over and which we are in a position to improve and bug fix. Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
