Hi On 12/06/2016 10:14 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On 6 December 2016 at 18:25, Victor Olaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Slightly off topic, but I'm not sure (yet) if we should port the > actual algorithms themselves to c++. For my purposes (Matthias might > disagree here) it would be sufficient to allow algorithms to be fully > created in c++ only if required. Otherwise, I quite like having the > algorithms themselves as small python wrappers around inbuilt > functionality.
I am not sure I would just move everything to core. The advantage of having only a couple of them in core and many of them written in python gives us many more developers who develop and fix them. The important bit is, that python is an option and no longer a requirement. What would be interesting is to port one or a few algorithms to C++ and see how big the performance impact is. Matthias _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
