Hi Andreas and Nyall, Please, share the conclusions here, after you find the problem.
Thanks! Pedro 2017-02-01 10:02 GMT+00:00 Andreas Neumann <[email protected]>: > Sure - I'll send it to you as a geopackage file. > > Andreas > > > > On 01.02.2017 11:01, Nyall Dawson wrote: > >> On 1 February 2017 at 19:55, Neumann, Andreas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Nyall, >>> >>> Thanks for the explanations. I should have read the explanations of the >>> help text more closely. It explains it all. >>> >>> However, there still seem to be issues. Consider the following results >>> below. First column is the result of $area, second column is >>> area($geometry). >>> >>> Sometimes the results are very close, in other cases the difference is >>> massive. Like in the very first row. 32'087 vs 190'605'589 square meters. >>> This can't be explained with ellipsoidical vs. planimetric. In this first >>> row, the result of area($geometry) (planimetric) seems correct, while the >>> ellipsoidical result ($area) is massively wrong. >>> >>> How can this huge difference be explained? >>> >>> Can you share your dataset? >> >> Nyall >> > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
