Il 07/02/2017 10:59, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > Well, ideally not. Currently we only break projects which rely on very > old features (such as 1.x labeling, conversion from old symbology, > some composer features from maybe 2.6 or earlier). None of these > breaks are ever likely to be encountered by users. > > But breaking data defined transparency may.
IMHO the break is not desirable, but acceptable, if the advantage is more consistency. I think we can prepare a short Migration guide pointing out all the points to be taken care of/check/modify for the end user. Cheers. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
