Opacity is more coherent with graphic softwares (and I generally talk about opacity when designing maps) but IMHO transparency is more intuitive for the lay users, and it's a quite conmon terminology in GIS softwares.
Maybe opacity could be used for styling and transaprency for the global layer rendering (general layer properties, etc.), both for vectors and rasters. giovanni Il 20 feb 2017 09:30, "Paolo Cavallini" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Il 20/02/2017 09:28, Nyall Dawson ha scritto: > > > Seems like a strong consensus here for "stroke". I'll try and make > > this change sometime this week (should be mostly search and replace) > > great, thanks. how about Opacity vs Transparency? > > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html > https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
