Hi Stéphane, Thanks for testing the new dialog!
I think that if you find a bug (a crash or something that doesn't work as expected) you should open an issue on the hub and assign it to me. For general feed-back or change proposal for the UI/UX you can either use this thread or make a PR with the proposed changes and discuss them in the the PR. Cheers On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Stéphane Henriod <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alessandro > > I just downloaded the latest nightly build and will make some tests in the > coming days. What would be the most efficient / useful way to give you > feedback and comments? On this thread? > > Thanks and cheers > > Stéphane > > > Le jeudi 1 juin 2017, Alessandro Pasotti <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stéphane Henriod <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I really look forward to testing it :-) Thanks a lot for our involvement >>> here! >>> >>> >> >> Thanks to Boundless for funding the development and thanks to all of you >> who participated with design, mockups, ideas, comments and reviews! >> >> This was a nice and effective cooperation. >> >> >> BTW, if you can't wait, a Docker with a nigthly build of the PR branch is >> available as "boundlessgeo/qgis-testing-environment:unified-button" >> >> Cheers >> >> >>> >>> Le mercredi 31 mai 2017, Alessandro Pasotti <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> final update: the development of what was in phase 1 is done. >>>> >>>> Actually, a bit more than phase 1 considering that we've redesigned the >>>> delimited text dialog GUI and I've done quite a bit of small refactorings >>>> of the providers selection dialogs interfaces. >>>> >>>> There has been a lot of feed-back, thank you all! >>>> >>>> As expected, there is no complete agreement over the final GUI bits for >>>> the menus and toolbars, and we still miss an icon (the green plus that I've >>>> used was only meant as a placeholder). I tried to keep the old toolbar >>>> available (disabled by default) mainly because it can spare a click and >>>> power users might want it back. Also, the new icon is the most prominent in >>>> the left bar and it's the first menu item in the layers menu. >>>> >>>> I have not a strong opinion about those toolbars and menus but I think >>>> I should wait no more and merge it as it is, then give the people some time >>>> to test the actual implementation and decide how to improve it. >>>> >>>> I kept the controversial part in a single commit so that it will be >>>> very easy to revert and propose a different placement for menus, icons and >>>> toolbars. >>>> >>>> >>>> Any objections if I proceed? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Alessandro Pasotti <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> a quick update: >>>>> >>>>> I've prepared a PR with a working prototype in >>>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/4629, I need some feed-back and >>>>> some help, expecially UX/UI about if we want it as a dockable dialog too >>>>> (and how to make it user-configurable). >>>>> >>>>> Feed-back welcome (but please keep it limited in scope to phase 1). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 19-05-17 01:23, Nyall Dawson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > On this note - I've recently discovered the need for some type of >>>>>> > reusable layer selection widget which allows choice of existing >>>>>> > layers/loading new layers from the file system/loading new layers >>>>>> from >>>>>> > available db/online connections. This would be extremely valuable >>>>>> for >>>>>> > processing too! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > So I'm really glad to hear that you'll be pushing ahead with this >>>>>> work >>>>>> > - thanks Boundless! >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, and thanks Alessandro for the screenie. Makes me want more! >>>>>> >>>>>> @Nyall in Essen the talk was to start with what Alessandro wrote in >>>>>> his >>>>>> email, so 1 dialog 'merging' all buttons/widgets/dialogs into one, >>>>>> reuse >>>>>> as much as possible. So it was possible to get it into 3.0 >>>>>> >>>>>> Off course people (.../me) started brainstorming about features which >>>>>> w/could be added too :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Your idea adds (I think) to the idea to make some kind of >>>>>> 'datamanagement-console' in near future, where you can create/copy >>>>>> data(!), move data around (browser part) or delete it. >>>>>> Your note fits in this isn't it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Richard >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alessandro Pasotti >>>>> w3: www.itopen.it >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Alessandro Pasotti >>>> w3: www.itopen.it >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> “When you travel, remember that a foreign country is not designed to >>> make you comfortable. It is designed to make its own people comfortable." >>> -- Clifton Fadiman >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Alessandro Pasotti >> w3: www.itopen.it >> > > > -- > > “When you travel, remember that a foreign country is not designed to make > you comfortable. It is designed to make its own people comfortable." -- > Clifton Fadiman > > -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
