Hi
> On 23 Dec 2017, at 06:40, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Just wondering... before 3.0 launch, should we remove > QgsProject.instance() from the Python bindings, in favour of something > like iface.activeProject()? +1 That sounds much more intuitive to me. Regards Tim > > Sometime in the future (4.0?) we'll end up killing > QgsProject.instance(), but in the meantime is it a good move to push > people away from relying on this method? > > I'd say yes, given that the 2.x -> 3.0 api break is so huge anyway and > will generally result in substantial plugin rewriting (vs just > modifying a few methods), maybe we're better off to get PyQGIS > developers to deal with this now and factor it into their new > designs?* > > Nyall > > * based on the belief that 3.x -> 4.0 will be a gentler transition!! > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer — Tim Sutton Co-founder: Kartoza Project chair: QGIS.org Visit http://kartoza.com <http://kartoza.com/> to find out about open source: Desktop GIS programming services Geospatial web development GIS Training Consulting Services Skype: timlinux IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
