+1 the more intuitive names the better
and thanks for your explanation earlier about when not to use the 'activeProject' Richard On 23-12-17 05:40, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wondering... before 3.0 launch, should we remove > QgsProject.instance() from the Python bindings, in favour of something > like iface.activeProject()? > > Sometime in the future (4.0?) we'll end up killing > QgsProject.instance(), but in the meantime is it a good move to push > people away from relying on this method? > > I'd say yes, given that the 2.x -> 3.0 api break is so huge anyway and > will generally result in substantial plugin rewriting (vs just > modifying a few methods), maybe we're better off to get PyQGIS > developers to deal with this now and factor it into their new > designs?* > > Nyall > > * based on the belief that 3.x -> 4.0 will be a gentler transition!! > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
