On 18 January 2018 at 08:06, Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > So I would suggest raising a vote on the motion: > > “We should adopt GitHub issues for reporting issues in 3.0 and restrict > Redmine for the management of issues in QGIS 2.x”. > > After there are no more active 2.x releases, we make the Redmine tracker read > only and keep it around as an archive. We could put into the GitHub issue > template: “Only use this tracker for 3.x related issues” and similar message > on Redmine indicating that it should only be used for 2.x issues. It will > unfortunately leave us in the position where you need to check to issue > trackers for your issue which is going to suck a bit.
I'm a bit unclear where 2.18 fits in - would Redmine be open for new 2.18 bugs? Or would they be reported on github? Nyall _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
