Il 21/02/2018 10:59, Tim Sutton ha scritto: >> On 21 Feb 2018, at 09:01, Paolo Cavallini <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> as plugin manager, I'd appreciate this enormously; I wish there was a >> clear policy, with no room for interpretation. Having >= 1 ticket marked >> as critical could be one, but this just moves decisions one step ahead. >> Do you have a practic proposal? > > > Can you clarify here if the ticket should be in QGIS tracker or in > plugin repo tracker?
I confirm, I meant in the bugtracker of each individual plugin. > What is to stop them just chasing the ticket state > and then asking for a release? This is exactly what I meant with "move decisions one step ahead". Sorry for being unclear. In short, what we need is a clear criterion for deprecation, with as little subjectivity as possible. I would welcome any suggestion on this. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
