On 08-03-18 09:05, Bas Couwenberg wrote: > On 2018-03-08 08:43, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: >> As we have OSM xyz layer now, and I think a lot of people will use it as >> a quick reference map, we should be carefull to include proj5 in >> distributions/installs then I think? >> >> Like: let's not put proj5 as default in Osgeo4w untill this is >> fixed/released. > > When distributions don't adopt proj 5.0.0 it won't get much real world > usage and hence won't uncover other regressions that should be fixed in > the next release. > > There were many release candidates, but only a handful of testers. > > OSGeo projects should get more involved testing new core library release > candidates to catch regressions like these earlier.
I mostly agree: /me running Debian sid is supposed to hit this. I'm ok with it. But given we know this is an issue now, we should not distribute this further to Windows users/osgeo4w who are NOT running a testing setup. More testing is always better. But for users/end-users it is pretty hard to keep testing all functionality in all packages used. These bugs just hit you when you use them. Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
