On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 20:08, Tom Chadwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, fine. I think "unsupported" is not the right term, and probably > shouldn't be used in this particular case. It's an occasion when more > explanation is probably required, in my opinion: > > "Although 2.18 remains the LTR until [DATE], no further bugfixes are planned > for the QGIS2 branch. This is because the next LTR will be QGIS3.4. Bug > reports raised against QGIS2 will no longer be investigated, so please test > any problems you experience with QGIS3."
"no further bugfixes WILL BE MADE for QGIS2." ;) Otherwise there's a chance this can be read as "we don't PLAN on any bug fixes, but if something big happens, we may fix it". Nyall > > Something like that, anyway. I just don't like the possible implication that > we are knocking off a month early, by no longer "supporting" the LTR. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > ----- > Buy Pie Spy: Adventures in British pastry 2010-11 on Amazon > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
