Thanks for your offer of help. I agree that the mail should be sent only for plugins not updated in the last (3? 6? 9?) months. Could you please start filling up a ticket on https://issues.qgis.org/issues so we can define specs resulting from this thread and start implementing it? Cheers.
On 01/02/19 22:40, Thomas Baumann wrote: > Hi Paolo, > > sounds like a good idea to send a reminder once a year to the maintainer > and mark plugins as unmaintained if no feedback is received. > > I am available to help implementing it. > > Regards, > Thomas > > > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019, 19:01 hat Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it > <mailto:cavall...@faunalia.it>> geschrieben: > > Hi Thomas, > > On 01/02/19 13:53, Thomas Baumann wrote: > > > I made the experience that there are QGIS-plugins which are not > > maintained anymore. > > Example: > > > > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-Rectangles-Ovals-Digitizing-plugin-deprecated-td5366686.html > > > > Recently I asked some maintainers if they have plans to update their > > plugins to be QGIS3-ready because I was willing to update them if the > > maintainer wouldn't do it... but again I got the impression that some > > plugins are not maintained anymore. > > Example: > > https://github.com/NathanW2/selection-sets/issues/5 > > > > Now that there is the change from QGIS2 to QGIS3 some unmaintained > > plugins will just dissapear like through a "natural selection". But in > > one or two years there could again be lots of unmaintained plugins > which > > could have bugs that slow down qgis or make them unstable like it > > happened with the Rectangles-Ovals-Digitizing-plugin ( > > https://github.com/vinayan/RectOvalDigitPlugin/issues/6 ). > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to check once a year if all plugins are still > > maintained? > > > > You could for example use something like LimeSurvey ( > > https://www.limesurvey.org/community ) and ask every maintainer to > > respond if they still feel responsible for the plugin. In the > backend of > > Limesurvey you have a database with the responses so it should be > quite > > easy to automatically synchronize the results with your > repository-items. > > This way the unmaintained plugins could be marked as deprecated if no > > response is sent back. > > thanks a lot for your suggestion. I agree that the move to QGIS 3 > automatically purges old unmaintained code, but this does not solve > entirely the issue. > In short do you suggest we should run a survey once a year, sending it > to the list of plugin maintainers, and marking as deprecated all plugins > for which we do not receive a positive response? > I would be a bit skeptical, as many plugins are still useful even if not > actively maintained. An alternative would be to add to our Django app an > automatic reminder to be sent to maintainer, asking to confirm they > maintenance; in absence of a feedback, we could mark it as unmaintained, > and make this visible to users, so they have the options of adopting it, > supporting it, or stopping using it before it actually stops working. > How does it sound? in case you agree on this or a modified version of > it, would you be available to help implementing this? > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu> > QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair: > http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/ > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS.ORG Chair: http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/ _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer