On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 11:43, Denis Rouzaud <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1. But, we should indeed have a strict definition of when adding the > milestone (someone is taking care of the fix or every time it's just > considered as important). I'd rather keep milestones for PRs and maybe bring > back the idea of "blocker" tag. I think it should only be defined by someone actually assigned to the bug. E.g. if I self-assign a bunch of bugs I'm actively working on, I'd like to be able to use milestones to self-manage these... Nyall >> >> >> Nyall >> >> * Ideally, we'd block non-core-contributors from setting milestones >> for issues, to avoid reporters just tagging their issue with an >> upcoming milestone as a rude way of saying "fix my stuff for me" >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
