On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 09:06, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Once again, many many thanks to the individuals behind the the recent > issues migration. Fantastic job all round! > > I'd like to do some post-migration cleanups, but would like wider > opinions on how to handle these: > > - We have two labels "bug" and "bug fix" which apply to issues and > pull requests respectively. Can we combine these, and just use "bug" > for bug fixing PRs? (There's a LOT of labels now)
Done > > - "Database" label: should this be renamed "db manager", to > disambiguate from postgis/spatialite/etc issues, which instead belong > under "data providers"? Done > > - Can "CAD" be merged into "Digitising"? There's only a handful of > open issues, and I don't think it warrants a separate category. In > QGIS these two concepts are basically merged now anyway. Based on discussion, I've renamed this to DXF/DWG for clarification > - "Easy fix". Does anyone actually use this? Many of these are not > "easy fixes" -- e.g. I've been chipping away at > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/28195 since last year... it's > probably about the hardest fix I've ever done in QGIS. No idea how > this one gained the label! Ok, seems there's a strong argument to leave this in place! Nyall _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
