On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:05 PM Martin Dobias <wonder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas > > Thanks for the overview of the financial side of things. Regarding budget > allocation it would make sense to me to reduce bug-fixing and grants budget > and increase the spending on reviews. In my opinion both bug-fixing and > grants need some improvements anyway to bring more value to QGIS project, > but that's for a separate discussion (e.g. more focus on high priority > bugs, better voting system for grants to consider relevance/impact + > proposal quality + cost). > Yeah, we can certainly discuss how to improve both processes but, if I mostly agree with you about the grants I believe that the bugfixing budget should not be reduced (perhaps increased) and that being able to focus on QGIS bugfixing for a given number of days really makes a difference. > > Speaking of myself, I would be happy to join the paid reviews efforts to > lower the fatigue of reviewers. And I hope it would attract some other QGIS > devs to join as well... > > That would be awesome, thank you! Cheers -- Alessandro Pasotti QCooperative: www.qcooperative.net ItOpen: www.itopen.it
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer