On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 01:02:22PM +0200, Anita Graser wrote: > Hi Richard, > > On 21.09.2021 07:55, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote: > > I would be ok with both IRC, but I think a #qgis-dev channel on either > > matrix.org or matrix.osgeo.org would do. > > There are proper matrix clients for web and phones ( even for Linux phones > > ;-) ). > > Do you have an overview of matrix activities? > > https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/support.html says "point your browser > to (https://matrix.to/#qgis:osgeo.org > <https://matrix.to/#qgis:osgeo.org>)" which is an invalid link.
That's probably my fault, the actual link is probably: https://matrix.to/#/#qgis:osgeo.org Note the double hash. I remember one day one client failed to accept the double hash as a valid URL so I tried the single-hash version and it worked, and I assumed it would keep working, which was evidently wrong. > https://app.element.io/#/room/#qgis:osgeo.org says "QGIS.org QGIS > Official Matrix room | bridged to IRC and Gitter" but it does not bridge > to Gitter. I can take a look at the Gitter bridge, could be a temporary issue. > Instead, https://app.element.io/#/room/#qgis_QGIS:gitter.im is the one > that does bridge to Gitter but has pretty much no traffic. That's not a "plumbed" bridge, but rather a "portal" to gitter. Matrix also supports "portals" to IRC, with links like: https://matrix.to/#/#qgis:libera.chat The difference is that "portals" will obey to access control list defined by the target, while "plumbed" rooms would obay to rules defined on Matrix itself. I know, it is confusing :) > Looks like some consolidation might be helpful but I'm not sure how / if > that is possible. Yes it is possible --strk; _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer