Hi devs, I didn't get any reply so I wonder if it is because nobody knows, nobody cares, or something else... Other than the concern of "adding/keeping a broken tool" in QGIS, we have a PR in the docs we don't really know how to finalize, so a feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks. Regards, Harrissou (for the docs team) Le mar. 28 oct. 2025 à 10:38, DelazJ <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Devs, > In the "Geometry checker" core plugin, there is that option > called "Polygons must follow boundaries of layer ...", of which a > Processing alg "Polygons exceeding boundaries" was recently created. > While testing the algorithm in order to properly document it, we came > across weird results (also output by the geometry checker) that we are > unable to explain/understand their coherence. > > Issues and discussion are availabel at > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/63454 and > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/10314#issuecomment-3425649278 > > 1/ Does anyone *KNOW* how this option is really supposed to check? and > understand the logic behind the output? > 2/ If there is agreement that this tool does not adress any real use case, > is it something we want to keep in QGIS (in this state)? > > Looking forward to your replies. > Regards, > Harrissou >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
