I'd say go for it. I like the LLVM approach.
Thanks for addressing this. On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 7:26 PM Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > as we're starting to get vibe coded pull requests, it might be > interesting to adopt a policy similar to the one of LLVM pointed at > https://www.phoronix.com/news/LLVM-Human-In-The-Loop. I guess we could > just copy&paste it replacing LLVM by QGIS. Won't stop the flow but at > least we'd have something to point "vibe contributors" to. > > Even > > -- > http://www.spatialys.com > My software is free, but my time generally not. > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alessandro Pasotti QCooperative: www.qcooperative.net ItOpen: www.itopen.it _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
