I think the LLVM policy is good. I'm still ambivalent about LLMs, but they can
be useful, and banning them outright will not work. Some QGIS contributors are
already using them, and there's a large spectrum between LLM-assisted
completions (fancy autocomplete, not unlike the suggestion bar on a smartphone
keyboard) and "vibe coding" ("Hey Claude, add NURBS support").
Laurentiu
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026, at 20:20, Even Rouault via QGIS-Developer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as we're starting to get vibe coded pull requests, it might be
> interesting to adopt a policy similar to the one of LLVM pointed at
> https://www.phoronix.com/news/LLVM-Human-In-The-Loop. I guess we could
> just copy&paste it replacing LLVM by QGIS. Won't stop the flow but at
> least we'd have something to point "vibe contributors" to.
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
