On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 09:54, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for looking into this. It seems to be related to the CRS problems I 
> reported twice in the last weeks; here I get a non existent EPSG instead of 
> the correct 6670; the name (2011 Plane Rectangular II -- for Kyūshū) is 
> correct though.
>
> If you need material, please tell me.

Can you open a ticket on
 https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues with a sample dataset which shows
this issue?

>
> Maria
>
>
> > Am 27.03.2020 um 07:07 schrieb Nyall Dawson <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 04:33, Tyler Veinot <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> All;
> >> For some reason my QGIS thinks all my data is in EPSG 2292 but Esri says 
> >> it is in EPSG 2954 2954 is the only ESPG we use but QGIS keeps defaulting 
> >> back to 2292, is there a way I can delete 2292 entirely?
> >
> > I'd like to look into this. Can you open a ticket on
> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues with a sample dataset which shows
> > this issue?
> >
> > Nyall
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to