Great, I just opened this issue on github: CRS problems: EPSG code not correctly applied in QGIS 3.4 #35395
It is the first ticket that I open at github, if anything went wrong, please tell me. Best, Maria > Am 27.03.2020 um 09:18 schrieb Nyall Dawson <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 09:54, Priv.-Doz. Dr. Maria Shinoto > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thank you for looking into this. It seems to be related to the CRS problems >> I reported twice in the last weeks; here I get a non existent EPSG instead >> of the correct 6670; the name (2011 Plane Rectangular II -- for Kyūshū) is >> correct though. >> >> If you need material, please tell me. > > Can you open a ticket on > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues with a sample dataset which shows > this issue? > >> >> Maria >> >> >>> Am 27.03.2020 um 07:07 schrieb Nyall Dawson <[email protected]>: >>> >>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 04:33, Tyler Veinot <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> All; >>>> For some reason my QGIS thinks all my data is in EPSG 2292 but Esri says >>>> it is in EPSG 2954 2954 is the only ESPG we use but QGIS keeps defaulting >>>> back to 2292, is there a way I can delete 2292 entirely? >>> >>> I'd like to look into this. Can you open a ticket on >>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues with a sample dataset which shows >>> this issue? >>> >>> Nyall >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qgis-user mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user >> _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
