[
http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/QI-48?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_11302
]
Niclas Hedhman commented on QI-48:
----------------------------------
Actually, I now think that Layers and Modules should not be involved at all.
The ReSTful Access Extension acts as a pure client and the regular visibility
rules should simply apply.
> Support for retrieving all Entity types registered.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: QI-48
> URL: http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/browse/QI-48
> Project: Qi4j
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: ReST
> Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
> Assignee: Rickard Öberg
> Original Estimate: 2 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 2 hours
>
> The ReST Entity API should support retrieval of all registered entity types.
> I am suggesting that this is mounted on the following URL;
> /entity -> return all registered entities
> Also, I think this should take the query parameters "layer" and "module" to
> allow a particular layer or a particular module to be selected.
> Example;
> http://localhost:8182/entity?layer=domain
> http://localhost:8182/entity?layer=domain&module=accounting
> http://localhost:8182/entity?module=accounting
> The last case should find all modules in the system named accounting
> irregardless of which layer.
> I sugges the following format of the returned document;
> <types>
> <layer name="{layername}">
> <module name="{modulename}" >
> <type href="{typereference}">{type-classname}</type>
> <type href="{typereference}">{type-classname}</type>
> </module>
> </layer>
> </types>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.ops4j.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
qi4j-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
