On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When reporting thing like this, please provide the entire stack trace.
Right. Will do in future. > There is nothing per se that stops this from working, and there are > many testcases using inner classes. It could perhaps be that the > constructor is not public. Yes, the problem was that the constructor was not public. I realized that like 30 seconds after creating the issue :), but didn't realize that for the 10 odd minutes I was looking at the code! sorry about that. Cheers, Sonny _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
