On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Sonny Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is nothing per se that stops this from working, and there are > > many testcases using inner classes. It could perhaps be that the > > constructor is not public. > > Yes, the problem was that the constructor was not public. > I realized that like 30 seconds after creating the issue :), but > didn't realize that for the 10 odd minutes I was looking at the code! > sorry about that. Perhaps add a Improvement issue on Jira, where constructors should not be required to be public, since it could be good to protect classes from incorrect use. Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
